India • Mutual funds
India — Equity Funds vs Their Benchmarks
Last update: 20 Oct 2026
Over the ten years to September 2026, 92 of 149 active-equity direct plans beat their own category index, and the median plan returned 0.3 percentage points a year more than its index. Over three years, 196 of 263 beat their index.
Active management paid most often in small cap funds (11 of 12 beat the Nifty Smallcap 250 TRI over 10 years) and least often in mid cap funds (8 of 17). Of the plans in the top quarter over the three years before that, 23% were still top quarter over the latest three; a quarter would be by chance.
Every growth plan in India's ten active-equity categories against its own SEBI benchmark, over one to ten years: from all active equity, to a fund type, to a single fund. Beating the Nifty 50 is not the test for a small-cap fund; its benchmark is the small-cap index. Money flows by category come from mutual fund flows and SIP behaviour; the desk India’s mutual fund industry asks whether heavy inflows flattered returns.
- Latest month-end NAVsSep 2026AMFI NAV history
- Plans in the snapshot73210 categories, both plans, since Dec 2012
- Benchmark closesSep 2026NSE Indices
- Category flowsSep 2026AMFI monthly report
- Database loaded20 Oct 2026Exalytics
Active-equity direct plans beating their own index, 3 years
CalculatedFund type where the median plan beat its index by most, 10 years
CalculatedEarlier top-quarter plans still top quarter, 3 years then 3 years
CalculatedCost of a regular plan, all active equity
CalculatedFeatured · drill down
Fund types ranked by the median direct plan's margin over its index, ten years to September 2026
The dot is the median plan's return, the bar the middle half of plans, the dashed tick the category's own benchmark. Open a fund type for its plans.
For example: If the median small-cap plan returned 20% a year and its index 18%, the small-cap dot sits at 20% with the tick at 18%: a 2-point margin. A bar from 16% to 24% says the middle half of plans spanned 8 points, so picking the fund mattered more than picking the category.
Across all active equity, 92 of 149 direct plans beat their own index over the ten years to September 2026. The median small cap plan beat the Nifty Smallcap 250 TRI by +2.6 pp a year, the widest margin; the median mid cap plan trailed the Nifty Midcap 150 TRI by 0.5 pp a year.
Open a fund type to see every plan in it. Rows are ordered by the median plan's margin over the category's own index; the bar is where the middle half of plans landed, so a wide bar means fund choice mattered more than category choice. "Beat index" is plans whose return was higher than the index's over the same window; "dropped" is plans listed in the category today that had a NAV at the window's start but none at its end.
1 · Outperformance frequency
All active equity: share of direct plans beating their index, rolling ten years
Beating the index
Share of active-equity direct plans beating the index, ten years
Each point covers the ten years ending that month. Above 50% means most funds beat its own category's index; the number of funds varies as schemes launch, merge and close.
For example: If 20 plans have a full record for the window ending in a given month and 12 of them returned more than the index, the point for that month is 12 ÷ 20 = 60%.
Per cent of plans with a full window
- Share of plans beating the index
Returns
Median active-equity direct plan vs its own category's index, with the middle half of plans
The median plan's return, the index's return and the lower and upper quartiles over the same ten years. The median is the middle fund: half did better and half did worse. The dashed lines are the band the middle half of plans landed in.
For example: With five funds returning 10%, 12%, 14%, 15% and 20%, the median is 14%. If the index returned 13%, the median fund beat it by 1 percentage point.
Per cent a year
- Median direct plan
- Nifty 500 TRI (broad market)
- Upper quartile plan
- Lower quartile plan
2 · Consistency and risk
All active equity: margin over the index against volatility, plan by plan
Volatility against margin
Every active-equity direct plan, ten years to September 2026: volatility across, margin over the index up
One point per plan. Left of the dashed line the plan was steadier than its own category's index; above zero it beat it. A filled point's margin is larger than its month-to-month noise. The plans a reader wants are top-left: ahead of the index with less volatility.
For example: A plan 3 points a year ahead of its index with 14% volatility against the index's 16% sits above zero and left of the line: more return for a smoother ride.
Select a point to open the plan. Of the 144 active-equity direct plans with a NAV at every month-end of the ten years, 88 beat its own category's index, 58 did so with less volatility than the index, and 5 with a margin larger than their month-to-month noise.
Persistence of outperformance
All active equity: earlier top-quarter plans still top quarter 5 years later
At each month-end, direct plans are ranked by margin over their index over the 5 years just ended and the 5 years before that. The line is the share of the earlier top quarter still in the top quarter; by chance alone it would be 25%. The second line is the share that fell to the bottom quarter.
For example: If 8 of the 32 plans were top quarter in 2020–2023 and 3 of those 8 were top quarter again in 2023–2026, the point for September 2026 is 3 ÷ 8 = 38%.
Per cent of the earlier top quarter
- Still top quarter
- Fell to bottom quarter
Latest reading, Sep 2026: 24% of the earlier top quarter (41 plans still existing, 2 disappeared) were still top quarter, and 37% had fallen to the bottom quarter. Across the 45 month-ends with a reading, the share averaged 28% and was above the 25% chance level in 27 of them. Overlapping windows are not independent: a run of similar readings is largely one episode.
3 · Costs and money
All active equity: cost of regular plans and the response of flows to returns
Costs
Direct minus regular plan return: active-equity funds, ten years
Median direct-plan return minus the median regular-plan return of the same schemes, in percentage points. A regular plan is bought through a distributor and pays a commission out of the fund every year; a direct plan does not, so the gap is roughly that commission.
For example: If a fund's direct plan returned 16% a year and its regular plan 15%, buying through a distributor cost the investor about 1 percentage point a year.
Percentage points
- Direct minus regular, median
Money and returns
All active equity: net flow as a share of assets beside the median plan's trailing 12-month return
Bars are the month's net flow into the category's funds (subscriptions minus redemptions) as a share of its assets at the end of the previous month, from AMFI's monthly report. The line is the median direct plan's return over the 12 months ending that month. The table below asks whether this month's money follows the return of the months before it.
For example: If a category held ₹1 lakh crore at the end of March and took a net ₹2,000 crore in April, April's bar is 2%. If the median plan had returned 30% over the year to April, the line sits at 30 that month.
- Net flow, % of previous month's assets (bars, left)
- Median direct plan, 12-month return (line, right)
Flow response to returns: correlation of this month's net flow rate with the median plan's 12-month return ending the stated number of months earlier
| Return measured | same month | 1 month earlier | 2 months earlier | 3 months earlier | 4 months earlier | 5 months earlier | 6 months earlier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson r | +0.14 | +0.27 | +0.42 | +0.45 | +0.50 | +0.46 | +0.43 |
| Spearman ρ (ranks) | +0.10 | +0.31 | +0.48 | +0.50 | +0.52 | +0.41 | +0.34 |
| Months paired (≈ independent) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) | 89 (≈7) |
The strongest co-movement is with the return measured 4 months earlier: r = +0.50 over 89 months, so more money arrived after higher returns. Its interval includes zero once overlapping returns are allowed for, so the data do not rule out no relationship. ★ marks a 95% interval that excludes zero after allowing that consecutive 12-month returns share eleven months (about one independent observation per twelve). A correlation describes co-movement in this sample: investors may chase returns, returns may follow the money, or both may follow the market. AMFI publishes no fund-by-fund flows monthly, so this is the category, not the fund; SIP inflows by category exist only from August 2026.
4 · The fund universe
All active equity: plans listed and plans with a full ten years record
Survivorship
All active equity: direct plans AMFI lists each month, and those counted in the ten years window ending that month
The gap between the lines is launches too young for the window plus schemes that merged or closed inside it. Results above describe the second line only, which flatters them: a scheme that closed after losing money is not there to be counted.
For example: If 36 small-cap plans are listed in September 2026 but 24 have a NAV ten years earlier, the ten-year result rests on 24 plans, and the 12 others include recent launches and nothing about funds that disappeared.
Number of plans
- Direct plans AMFI lists
- Direct plans counted in the ten years window
Sources
Publishers in this snapshot
- Exalytics calculation from AMFI NAV history and NSE Indices ↗85,334 observations · Jan 2013 – Sep 2026 · some estimated, verified
- AMFI NAV history (portal.amfiindia.com) ↗75,527 observations · Dec 2012 – Sep 2026 · verified
- AMFI quarterly average AUM, scheme-wise (portal.amfiindia.com) ↗24,455 observations · Jan 2013 – Sep 2026 · verified
- AMFI monthly report (MCR), open-ended schemes ↗3,876 observations · Apr 2019 – Sep 2026 · verified
- NSE Indices Ltd, historical index data ↗1,162 observations · Dec 2012 – Sep 2026 · verified
- Exalytics calculation from AMFI monthly report (MCR), open-ended schemes ↗958 observations · May 2019 – Sep 2026 · verified
Snapshot
Citation and snapshot details
Dataset india-fund-performance-2026-09-20261020-d86d3a2f, refresh 4476c7aa-5ad4-5bfe-b988-8e2d8f38f20e, published 20 Oct 2026,
loaded into the database 20 Oct 2026. Every chart's table, CSV and Copy for AI carry each observation's Id,
status and source page.
Methodology and definitions
Comparison basis
Fund returns are NAV to NAV on growth options, after each scheme's expenses, from AMFI's month-end NAVs since December 2012; benchmarks are NSE total return indices with no costs. A fund sits in the category AMFI lists it under today (AMFI's history report applies today's categories to every date), and counts in a window when it has a NAV at both ends: funds merged or closed inside a window drop out, which flatters the survivors. Returns over more than a year are annualised. Rankings are by margin over the category's own benchmark, never by raw return. Past returns do not predict future ones; nothing here is investment advice.
Benchmark choice: the category index, not the Nifty 50
A small-cap fund must hold mostly small caps. When small caps as a group rise, every small-cap fund looks strong against the Nifty 50. Whether a manager added anything shows only against the small-cap index, which already contains the same rally. The all-active-equity view keeps that rule: each plan is judged against its own category's index, and the Nifty 500 TRI is drawn only as the broad-market reference.
Categories are today's
AMFI's NAV history report lists every scheme, including ones merged or closed years ago, under the category AMFI uses today: the file for December 2015 already carries a flexi-cap section, a category created in 2020. So a fund's category here is its current one for every date, and the multi-cap to flexi-cap reclassification of 2021 is already applied throughout. Sectoral and thematic funds have no single benchmark and are not included.
Survivorship
The universe at each date is every growth plan AMFI listed in the category that month, including schemes that later merged or closed. A window still needs a NAV at both ends, so funds that disappeared inside it are left out; the ladder and the fund-universe chart say how many. Scorecards that count them as losers show lower shares.
Consistency, risk and noise
The hit rate is the share of rolling 12-month windows inside a horizon in which the plan beat its index. Volatility is the standard deviation of monthly returns times √12. The deepest fall is the largest decline from a month-end high. "Margin vs noise" divides the average monthly margin over the index by its standard error; a reading above 2 means the margin is larger than month-to-month noise. No Sharpe ratio is shown: the snapshot holds no risk-free rate, and a Sharpe over zero would be wrong.
Persistence
Plans are ranked by margin in two consecutive windows of the same length. The share of the earlier top quarter still in the top quarter is compared with the 25% that chance alone gives. Rankings use margin over the index, so a category's own market cannot decide them.
Money flows
Category subscriptions, redemptions, net flow and assets are copied from the mutual fund flows snapshot (AMFI's monthly report, April 2019 onward); each copied row names the row it came from. Net flow is shown as a share of the previous month's assets so categories of different sizes compare. AMFI does not publish flows fund by fund monthly, and SIP inflows by category only from August 2026.
Not measured here
Returns after tax or exit loads, portfolio holdings and cash levels, fund-level flows, the timing of any investor's own SIP instalments, and the ELSS lock-in.
Guest preview
Sign in to continue with the complete fund performance topic
The dashboard is open to everyone. Sign in to read editor guidance and grounded Ask Exa answers.
Sign in unlocks
- Human-reviewed Exa refresh analysis and version history
- Editor guidance published through the topic CMS
- Ask Exa answers grounded only in approved published observations